Agence CAPA
 

Multi-year Digital Accessibility Plan 2026-2028 CAPA (STUDIO TF1)

Introduction

This multi-year digital accessibility plan presents CAPA (STUDIO TF1)’s policy and actions regarding digital accessibility for the 2026-2028 period. Its purpose is to define a trajectory for the gradual accessibility compliance of CAPA (STUDIO TF1)’s online public communication services, in accordance with the applicable legal framework and the General Accessibility Improvement Framework (RGAA). This plan is broken down into annual action plans. It will be updated according to changes in scope, audit results, governance decisions and remediation work carried out.

Legal and regulatory framework

Digital accessibility falls in particular within the framework of Article 47 of Law No. 2005-102 of 11 February 2005, the implementing texts relating to online public communication services, the RGAA and European standard EN 301 549. This plan does not constitute an accessibility statement and does not prejudge the level of compliance of the services concerned. Compliance levels must be established through audits and must be covered by accessibility statements specific to the services concerned. Where services fall within the scope of additional European legislation, in particular the European Accessibility Act, their inclusion must be assessed by the relevant departments.

General digital accessibility policy

As of the date on which this plan was prepared, CAPA (STUDIO TF1) is aligned with the TF1 Group’s digital accessibility policy. Digital accessibility is also intended to be integrated into the Group’s Diversity & Inclusion policy. However, no CAPA (STUDIO TF1)-specific policy, dedicated strategic document or specific deployment lever has been declared at this stage. The annual plan therefore provides for the gradual formalisation of a digital accessibility policy, specifying the objectives, scope, responsibilities and monitoring arrangements.

Disability, inclusion and equal access policy

CAPA (STUDIO TF1) has an existing support mechanism through the Disability Mission, through which employees with disabilities can express their specific needs. This mission can support the identification and provision of appropriate solutions, particularly in terms of equipment and workplace adjustments. The questionnaire also mentions that teams monitor best practices and adapt certain content, for example by subtitling video materials. However, these elements are not sufficient to establish a structured digital accessibility policy. The digital accessibility needs of employees and users are not yet subject to specific indicators or regular monitoring.

Digital accessibility governance

As of the date on which this plan was prepared, no formalised digital accessibility governance has been declared. No monitoring committee, steering mechanism or formalised sharing of responsibilities between technical, business, communications, legal, procurement and HR teams has been put in place. CAPA (STUDIO TF1) plans to define a progressive governance framework, suited to its organisation, to manage audits, remediation and budget decisions.

Digital accessibility officer

No digital accessibility officer has been appointed. Consequently, the officer’s functional position, duties, allocated time and any budget have not yet been defined. The annual plan provides for the appointment of a digital accessibility officer or, failing that, a clearly identified equivalent system. The officer’s duties should include coordinating the plan, monitoring the annual plan, liaising with audits, disseminating best practices, monitoring accessibility statements and centralising user feedback.

Human and financial resources

No specialised position, network of ambassadors or human resource dedicated to digital accessibility is planned. No dedicated budget for training, tools, audits or external expertise has been identified. CAPA (STUDIO TF1) may adjust the budget if accessibility needs increase.

Training, awareness-raising and skills management

Digital accessibility is not included in the internal training catalogue. The job descriptions of teams involved in development, design, digital product management, communications or marketing do not mention specific digital accessibility skills. Job postings are indicated as being open to people with disabilities, but no specific digital accessibility training is offered to new hires.

Use of external expertise

An accessibility audit is under way with Urbilog. However, no structured policy for using external expertise is described for training, team support, acceptance testing or assistance with remediation.Urbilog

Consideration of accessibility in digital projects

As of the date on which this plan was prepared, digital accessibility is not integrated into CAPA (STUDIO TF1)’s overall digital strategy, the scoping objectives of new projects, or the evaluation criteria for digital projects. The annual plan provides for the gradual integration of accessibility criteria from the scoping, design, development, editorial contribution, acceptance testing and production release phases. This integration must be documented in project procedures and in the tools used by the teams.

Acceptance testing, control and validation process

Acceptance tests include specific checks relating to digital accessibility. However, the anomaly tracking tool does not include an “accessibility” category, regression testing does not cover accessibility, and the precise validation steps are not formalised.

Consideration of accessibility in procurement, contracts, calls for tenders and agreements

No specific contractual clause relating to digital accessibility is currently declared in calls for tenders, quotations, contracts or agreements. The scoring and selection criteria for service providers do not include digital accessibility requirements.

Compliance audits and accessibility statements

A first audit is planned for 2026. No level of compliance can therefore be asserted in this plan. Following the audits, CAPA (STUDIO TF1) must publish or update the accessibility statements for the services concerned, specifying the non-accessible content, any exemptions, the alternatives offered and the available remedies.

Corrective measures and remediation monitoring

Corrective measures must be defined after the results of the audit under way. A follow-up audit is planned, but no formal process for prioritising corrections has been declared.

User testing, particularly with people with disabilities

No partnership with associations representing people with disabilities and no user testing system involving people with disabilities is planned.

Processing user feedback

Reporting channels, the procedure for handling requests, the people responsible for follow-up and the methods for responding to users or employees have not been defined to date.

Technical and functional scope

The technical and functional scope has not been specified to date.

Additional commitments

The adaptation of certain video content, for example the subtitling of video materials, is central to CAPA (STUDIO TF1)’s content production activities.

Annual action plans

This plan is broken down into annual action plans. For 2026, the actions are mainly devoted to formalising governance, appointing the accessibility officer, mapping the scope, conducting the audit and preparing accessibility statements. The 2027 and 2028 plans will need to be established or updated based on the results of the 2026 audit, the corrections undertaken and the available monitoring indicators.